郑睿恒 (Ruiheng Zheng)

实习经历

Publication

1. 01

   Effective Learning Rate Governs Loss Dynamics in Language Model Pretraining

   Zihan Liu^ⓡ, Ruiheng Zheng^ⓡ, Shaobo Zhang, Changxin Tian, Kunlong Chen, Zhiqiang Zhang, Lei Wu

   ^ⓡ 同等贡献；组内随机排序。

   arXiv preprint/2026arXiv 论文

   Abstract

   We uncover ELR collapse in language model pretraining: learning rate (LR) and parameter norm govern loss dynamics primarily through their ratio, the effective learning rate (ELR). When ELR is matched across runs, their loss trajectories collapse throughout training despite substantially different LRs and parameter norms. Across optimizers, architectures, datasets, and model scales, mean collapse errors are typically a few × 10⁻³, below the seed-to-seed variation measured in a representative configuration. Systematic ablations identify normalization design and the timescale of LR-norm variation as key determinants of collapse precision. Controlled interventions further show that weight decay and Hyperball shape loss dynamics primarily through the ELR schedules they induce. Replacing LR with ELR enables a fitted functional scaling law (FSL) to transfer across norm-control methods. The resulting ELR-based FSL also explains delayed acceleration, a recurring effect of norm control. Together, these results establish ELR as a common coordinate linking LR scheduling, norm control, and loss dynamics.

2. 02

   Optimal Learning Rate Schedules under Functional Scaling Laws: Power Decay and Warmup-Stable-Decay

   Binghui Li, Zilin Wang, Fengling Chen, Shiyang Zhao, Ruiheng Zheng, Lei Wu

   Conference on Learning Theory (COLT)/2026arXiv 论文

   Abstract

   We study optimal learning rate (LR) schedules under the functional scaling law (FSL) framework (Li et al., 2025), which decomposes training dynamics into signal learning and noise forgetting. In power-law kernel regression, these two components are governed by a source exponent s > 0 and a capacity exponent q > 1, respectively, with smaller s corresponding to harder tasks. For a fixed training horizon N, we characterize the schedules that minimize the final-step loss under a stability constraint and reveal a sharp phase transition. In the easy-task regime s > 1 − 1/q, the optimal schedule follows power decay from the beginning of training; in the hard-task regime s < 1 − 1/q, it becomes warmup-stable-decay (WSD)-like (Hu et al., 2024), staying at the largest admissible LR for most of training before a final decay. In both regimes, the decay exponent is 2q − 1: task difficulty determines when to decay, while model capacity determines how to decay. Beyond the exact optimum, we study fractional schedules, whose shape is defined over relative training progress. We show that precise tuning of the decay shape is often unnecessary: a broad class of profiles attains the optimal convergence rate, while overly slow terminal decay leads to schedule-induced capacity saturation. Finally, for one-pass SGD in kernel regression, FSL-motivated power-decay schedules achieve optimal last-iterate rates. Experiments support the theoretical predictions and the task-dependent transition between early and delayed decay.